I think that added element of wtenir-like conditions could make for an interesting game and def make for interesting television, but the Super Bowl is less about a game and more about the pageantry, and all of the ancillary events that go on around the game. Media day is usually held in the stadium, and there are parties and other things that are associated with the event that are helped by warmer climates. Obviously, the game has been in Minneapolis and Detroit, so those issues can be overcome (aside from media day, that was helped by having a domed stadium in those cities). It seems to come down to spectator comfort (it’s quite possible the teams could have played in adverse wtenir conditions in their conference championship games). And many times when the game has been in Florida, there has been a steady rain falling for some or all of the game.I like it, because it could lead to DC getting a chance to host a Super Bowl. But one issue is that as more and more cities become eligible to host the game, there’s a much greater chance that you could end up with a home team in the game. Many are pointing to Dallas as a potential first ever home team to play in a Super Bowl in their own stadium. It could have been New Orleans this year had the timing aligned (Saints being good and the Superdome being the host site). But once NY/NJ has hosted, who’s to say DC can’t host then Boston (New England), or Green Bay, or Pittsburgh? While this would allow many more people access to the game, it would seem to increase the odds that you could end up with a home team in the Super Bowl. And while the home field advantage would seem to be the most glaring aspect of this, consider the ticket allocations. The NFL controls tickets to the Super Bowl, and each team gets an equal allotment (and corporations get the lion’s share), so how do you stage a game in Pittsburgh or New England, with passionate fan bases, and then tell them only 25% of the season ticket holders will even have access to buying the tickets on the primary market? The great equalizer now is that fans have to be wealthy enough to afford the expensive tickets and the trip to go to the Super Bowl site when it’s in your city, and your team is playing, ticket demand will be incredible, and the beneficiary will be the secondary market (ticket brokers and scalpers).One thing this trend (if it becomes a trend) could lead to is the tabling of the discussion of a London (or any other non-US market) SB. If you are now opening up cities like NY, DC, Boston, Philly, Pitt, Cleveland, etc for consideration, it would be all the more difficult to justify taking the game to foreign soil.